Legal Opinion

Mobley v. Richfield Oil Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1942No. Civ. 3036PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action to rescind and cancel a written lease on the ground that it had been fraudulently obtained, and for declaratory relief. The main defense relied upon was a claimed waiver by the plaintiffs of the right of rescission through continued compliance, after discovery, with the terms of the lease and a sublease and the payment of certain amounts thereunder. The court found in all respects in favor of the plaintiffs finding, among other things, that the lease had been obtained by fraudulent representations, that the plaintiffs immediately after discovery had demanded the cancellation…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Craig v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ibrahim v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Mayer v. Northwood Textile Mills, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Flash Cleaners, Inc. v. Columbia Appliance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Ibrahim v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Richfield Oil Corp. v. MobleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API