Bland v. Hammond
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSharer, J.
In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the unprofessional conduct of an attorney, resulting in the dismissal of his client’s tort action, amounted to fraud and, if so, whether the fraud was extrinsic and, thus, a basis for vacating the judgment of dismissal. We shall hold that the conduct of the attorney did not, on the extant facts, rise to the level of extrinsic, fraud.
Charlain Bland, appellant, excepts to the denial of her motion to vacate judgment by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. Bland raises two issues, which we have rephrased as: 1
Whether the unprofessional…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- ESTIME v. KingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Furda v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Access Funding, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Furda v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010