In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Dealy
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
This is an appeal of a dissolution decree. Appellant-husband contends that the trial court erred in "refusing to hear and determine matters pertaining to alimony [support] for the wife.” The trial court refused to consider the matter of support because of its earlier ruling that this matter was res judicata based upon a previous decree of separate maintenance.
The parties were married in 1954. In August 1973 the court issued a decree of separate maintenance "for an unlimited period of time to and including January 5, 1975.” The separate maintenance decree provided, in part:
ife ifc sfc
"(11)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. WattleOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Garnett v. GarnettOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Proebstel v. TroutOregon Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schaffer v. SchafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- In re the Marriage of EslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- McKnight v. McKnightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- In re the Marriage of FletcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985