Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Marriage of Fletcher

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 1985No. 385-716; CA A30445Published

1DissentRossman, J.

Alimony is alimony. Why is the majority trying to avoid the obvious? The award of “lump sum alimony” payable in monthly installments from husband to wife clearly is spousal support and not a property settlement distribution. Because I believe that the trial judge correctly decided the issue, I dissent.

The majority points out that labels are not dis-positive in this regard but that the controlling issue is the nature and purpose of the award. In examining that issue, this court has tended to conclude that an award is spousal support when the following factors are present: (1) it is labeled…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of EslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of DealyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API