Schaffer v. Schaffer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Husband appeals the denial of his motion, pursuant to ORS 107.407, 1 to terminate spousal support. Wife presented evidence that the original dissolution decree did not provide for spousal support but, instead, provided for a division of property and could not be terminated. We find that husband’s monthly obligation is part of a property division and thus not subject to termination under ORS 107.407.
The parties had been married for 27 years at the time of their divorce on November 30, 1970. At the time of the divorce, both were 46 years of age. Wife was employed part-time at J. C. Penney’s.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Garnett v. GarnettOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- In re the Marriage of HoreskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Carrier v. CarrierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of DealyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Marriage of HardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Matter of Marriage of MoakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- In re the Marriage of AshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- In re the Marriage of EslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- In re the Marriage of ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.