Legal Opinion

Independent Contractors Research Institute v. Department of Administrative Services

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 26, 2006No. A123407PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Petitioners challenge the validity of rules promulgated by the Department of Administrative Services (DAS) to implement the Products of Disabled Individuals Act (PDIA), ORS 279.835 to 279.855. In their eight assignments of error, petitioners argue that the fiscal impact statement accompanying the new rules was inadequate and that several of the rules create policies that are not authorized by the PDIA. We hold that the rules are valid.

The key provision of the PDIA requires public agencies to purchase products and services from nonprofit providers, outside of the competitive bidding process…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Marks v. McKenzie High School Fact-Finding TeamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Dika v. Department of Insurance & FinanceOregon Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bialostosky v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. BWK, Inc. v. Department of Administrative ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. City of Cornelius v. Dept. of Land ConservationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API