Legal Opinion
Dika v. Department of Insurance & Finance
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 1991No. DIF WCD 1-1990; CA A64719; SC S37964PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.
The issue in this administrative law case is whether respondent Department of Insurance and Finance complied with a statute requiring that a fiscal impact statement, con-taininginformation described in the statute, be included in a government agency’s notice of proposed rulemaking. ORS 183.335 in part provides:
“(1) Prior to the adoption, amendment or repeal of any rule, the agency shall give notice of its intended action:
<<$ * * * *
“(2)(b) The agency shall include with the notice of intended action * * *:
<<* * # * %
“(D) A statement of fiscal impact identifying state agencies, units of local…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Scovill v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Eduardo v. Clatsop Community Resource Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Oregon Cable Telecommunications Ass'n v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Gasoline Marketers of Vermont, Inc. v. Agency of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.