Legal Opinion

Dika v. Department of Insurance & Finance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1991No. DIF WCD 1-1990; CA A64719; SC S37964PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

The issue in this administrative law case is whether respondent Department of Insurance and Finance complied with a statute requiring that a fiscal impact statement, con-taininginformation described in the statute, be included in a government agency’s notice of proposed rulemaking. ORS 183.335 in part provides:

“(1) Prior to the adoption, amendment or repeal of any rule, the agency shall give notice of its intended action:

<<$ * * * *

“(2)(b) The agency shall include with the notice of intended action * * *:

<<* * # * %

“(D) A statement of fiscal impact identifying state agencies, units of local…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Scovill v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Eduardo v. Clatsop Community Resource Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Oregon Cable Telecommunications Ass'n v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Gasoline Marketers of Vermont, Inc. v. Agency of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API