Pinkus v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Marion Circuit Court (22,440); Charles Remster, Judge. Action by Leah G. Pinkus against The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company and another. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoran, J.
On February 1, 1913, appellant and her husband took passage at Indianapolis on a Pullman car *40sleeper reserved for Jacksonville, Florida, enroute to the Panama Canal. The car was owned and in charge of the servants of appellee The Pullman Company to be transported over appellee The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company’s line of railroad. Upon reaching Louisville, Kentucky, in the course of her journey, appellant discovered that a small box and its contents, consisting of four rings and a lavaliere, all set with diamonds, which appellant carried with her as a part of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. JopesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Dwinelle v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Indiana Nitroglycerine & Torpedo Co. v. Lippincott Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cochran v. GritmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Holbrook v. NolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
- Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co. v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
- Mallard v. ZinkNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Pfeil v. Citizens Loan & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.