In re Breckenridge
Nevada Supreme Court
Original proceeding. Application of J. C. Breckenridge for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Per curiam
The petitioner was convicted and sentenced under a complaint containing the following statements: "Peter J. Haynes being duly sworn, complains and says that the crime of keeping and managing a disorderly house and inn has been committed in said County of Humboldt, and accuses the above-named defendant thereof; committed as follows, to wit: The said defendant, J. C. Breckenridge, on the 10th day of April, A. D. 1911, or thereabouts, and theretofore, at the County of Humboldt, State of Nevada, did keep and manage the Big Meadow Hotel, a house of public resort in the town of Lovelock, in a…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- In Re CoySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Dimmick v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- In Re EckartSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Floyd v. District Court of the Sixth Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Magee v. WhitacreNevada Supreme Court · 1939
- Lindsay v. LindsayNevada Supreme Court · 1929
- United States v. HennenDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1968
- Silva v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.