Peterson v. Montgomery Holding Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
J. — Plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, brought this action to recover commissions alleged to have been earned in procuring the Owl Drug Company as tenant for property in the city of Los Angeles owned by defendant upon which it proposed to erect a building. The trial proceeded until defendant’s written offer to pay the commission was received in evidence and the record showed (1) that defendant had never entered into a binding contract to lease the property to Owl Drug Company, (2) that defendant and the drug company had never agreed as to the terms of the lease, and (3) that defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stickel v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- McKenzie v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Douillard v. WooddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Roth v. MoellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Western Pipe & Steel Co. v. Tuolumne Gold Dredging Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Ridgway v. ChaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Cline v. YamagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Charles B. Webster Real Estate v. RickardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Denbo v. Weston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.