Legal Opinion
Subpoena Duces Tecum to Stearns v. Zulka
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 1986No. 3-785 A 185Published
1Opinion of the Court
489 N.E.2d 146 (1986)
In re SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO John STEARNS, Appellant (Petitioner below),
v.
Helen J. ZULKA, et al., Appellees (Respondents/Defendants below). Colby Vollmer, et al., Plaintiffs below,
v.
Helen J. Zulka, et al., Appellees (Defendants below).
No. 3-785 A 185.
Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District.
February 26, 1986.
W. Paul Helmke, Jr., Linda Peterson Powell, Helmke, Beams, Boyer & Wagner, Fort Wayne, for appellant.
Jerome J. O'Dowd, Fort Wayne, for appellees.
STATON, Presiding Judge.
John Stearns appeals a trial court order denying his motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Charles Baker v. F & F InvestmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Cuthbertson, Gerald M. Appeal of Cbs Inc., Third Party WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Judy Garland v. Marie TorreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Edward L. Carey v. Britt Hume, Jack AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.