Legal Opinion
United States v. Real Property Located at 475 Martin Lane
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 3, 2008No. Nos. 07-55390, 07-55424, 07-55714, 07-55872PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
The government, DAS Corporation (“DAS”), and Optional Capital, Inc. (“Optional”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of the government’s civil forfeiture complaint and grant of summary judgment in favor of Christopher Kim, Bora Lee, Erica Kim, Se Young Kim, Young Ai Kim, Alexandria Investment, LLC, and First Stephora Avenue, Inc. (“the Kim Claimants”).1 The Kim Claimants cross-appeal, arguing that the district court did not have jurisdiction over the Credit Suisse bank accounts. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we need not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Barthelemy v. Air Lines Pilots Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Optional Capital, Inc. v. Das CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Christopher KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- CP Salmon Corp. v. PritzkerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2017
- McDowell v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.