Legal Opinion
United States v. Kim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 13, 2015No. Nos. 12-56922, 13-55555, 13-55556PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed August 13, 2015 [797 F.3d 696], is amended as follows:
Slip opinion page 19 [797 F.3d at 706]: after <we see no reason to place statutory attorney’s fees awards beyond the reach of the Act.> add the following as a footnote: < Jurisdiction over claims against the United States is generally given to the Court of Federal Claims. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 1491(a). Nevertheless, although we concluded that CAFRA fee awards are claims against the United States, jurisdiction over them is expressly given to the district courts. See 18' U.S.C. § 983; 28 U.S.C. § 2465. >
With this…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Kerr Ex Rel. Kerr v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. RD Legal Funding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Cruise Lines Int'l Ass'n Alaska v. City & Borough of JuneauDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2018
- Skvorak v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Shealey v. WilkieCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.