Legal Opinion
Barthelemy v. Air Lines Pilots Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1990No. 88-15180PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal from summary judgment granted against them on the basis of orders entered by the district court March 31, 1987 and June 20, 1988. We affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by District Judge Robert F. Peckham in two orders quoted in full in Part I and for. the additional reason set out in Part II.
*1002I.
A
Judge Peckham’s Order of March 31, 1987
INTRODUCTION
In this suit, two TWA flight deck crew-members are challenging an August 5, 1985 agreement (“Agreement”) between the Airline Pilots Association (“ALPA”) and financier Carl Icahn. In that agreement, ALPA agreed to certain…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Sergio E. Fonseca v. Sysco Food Services of Arizona, Inc., a Delaware For-Profit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Robert C. Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Directv, Inc. v. Jeff BuddenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Kaypro, Debtor. Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Howard Justus, Trustee, in Re Kaypro, Debtor. Arrow Electronics, Inc., Successor-In-Interest to Schweber Electronics, Inc. v. Howard Justus, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Steven Ondo v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.