Legal Opinion
Booth v. Pence
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 24, 2005No. 2:01-cv-04296PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Pro se prisoner plaintiff Timothy Booth (“Booth”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Correctional Officer (“C/O”) Pence, Lieutenant (“Lt.”) Pickens, 1 C/O Foreman, Hearing Examiner Canino, and Superintendent Vaughn, all of whom are employees of the Pennsylvania State Department of Corrections (“DOC”). Following my order of February 12, 2003, granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion to dismiss, the only claims that remain in this case are Booth’s claims against C/O Pence, Lt. Pickens and C/O Foreman…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mack v. YostDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Alston v. WenerowiczDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- BUTLER v. PIERSONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- HALL v. SCI FAYETTEDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Simon v. SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.