Legal Opinion
Mack v. Yost
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 24, 2013No. Civil Action No. 3:10-264PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF COURT
KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge.
I. SYNOPSIS
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 36). Plaintiff Charles Mack, a federal inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Loretto, Pennsylvania (“FCI Loretto”), seeks damages resulting from alleged incidents of religious discrimination. Defendants contend, inter alia, that Mack’s allegations do not give rise to constitutional or statutory claims and that Mack has failed to exhaust available administrative remedies. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charles Mack v. Warden Loretto FCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Charles Mack v. John YostCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Charles Mack v. John YostCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
- Charles Mack v. Warden Loretto FCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- SIMMONS v. GILMOREDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021