Legal Opinion
Lone Star Security & Video, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 21, 2009No. 07-56521, 07-56575PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed July 10, 2009, and appearing at 572 F.3d 685 (9th Cir.2009), is withdrawn. A superseding opinion will be filed concurrently with this order. Further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed. Appel-lee/Cross-Appellant’s petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc, filed July 24, 2009, is denied as moot.
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
The City of Los Angeles routinely towed vehicles owned by Lone Star Security & Video, Inc. (Lone Star) for violating an ordinance that Lone Star contends was preempted by the California Vehicle Code.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Andrew Grimm v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Farris v. PooreDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012
- Horn v. City of Mackinac IslandDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2013
- Obsession Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Jerolyn Sackman v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.