Obsession Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. v. City of Rochester
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*463DECISION AND ORDER
CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, United ' States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the City of Rochester violated their federal constitutional- rights by restricting the hours of operation of their restaurant and bar in a manner that was inconsistent with New York State law. Now before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. [# 14]) and Defendant’s cross-motion [# 19] to dismiss the Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs’ application is denied, Defendant’s application…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Duran v. La Boom Disco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Obsession Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Obsession Sports Bar & Grill v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017