Legal Opinion

Andrew Grimm v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 21, 2020No. 18-35673PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANDREW GRIMM, No. 18-35673 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:18-cv-00183- MO CITY OF PORTLAND; L. MCHENRY; F. EARLE; RETRIEVER TOWING, Defendants-Appellees. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 13, 2019 Seattle, Washington Filed August 21, 2020 Before: Ronald M. Gould and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and Roger T. Benitez, * District Judge. Opinion by Judge Berzon * The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. Ruslan KirilyukCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. Leopoldo Rivera-ValdesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. Amanda B. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
  4. Amanda B. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
  5. Andrew Grimm v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API