Legal Opinion

Tate v. Morris, Graham & Morris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1922No. 10080PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; Ben M. Terrell, Judge. Action by Morris, Graham & Morris against W. L. Tate. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The appellees, Morris, Graham Morris, a real estate firm, sued W. L. Tate to recover $875 alleged to be due them as commissions for having procured a buyer, ready, able, and willing to purchase certain property situated near the city of Fort Worth, Tex., which had been listed with the plaintiffs for sale at the price of $17,500. The defendant, W. L. Tate, pleaded general denial.

There was evidence in behalf of the plaintiffs that the defendant, Tate, listed with them the property referred to, agreeing to give a commission of 5 per cent.; that the plaintiffs found as a prospective purchaser Mr.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Moss & Raley v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Brackenridge v. Claridge & PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hamburger & Dreyling v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Redwine v. HudmanTexas Supreme Court · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Carroll v. WiedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Pahl v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Paul S. Meisler v. Jacqueline A. Smith and Clarence E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API