Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Inman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 6, 1933No. 1159Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

In their motion for rehearing appel-lees insist that we are in error in holding that there was no evidence that the guardian did not procure orders of the probate court authorizing him to make expenditures for the -education and support of his wards. It is contended that the clerk’s certificate to the records of the probate court of Runnels county, introduced by appellees, constituted such evidence. In the statement of facts is found the following statement of appellees’ attorney: “The plaintiff next offers in evidence certified copies of the complete probate records from Runnels…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. Nalle & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Hewitt v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Standard v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API