Legal Opinion
Redwine v. Hudman
Texas Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1911No. 2111PublishedCited by 38 opinions
Error'to the Court of Civil Appeals, Second District, in an appeal from Lynn County. Hudman sued Henderson and Redwine and defendants had judgment, from which plaintiff appealed. On reversal and rendition for appellant, appelles obtained writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
This action was brought by Hudman against R. A. Henderson for specific .performance of a contract for the conveyance of land, Redwine, the plaintiff in error, being joined as a subsequent purchaser from Henderson. The contract is as follows:
“THE STATE OF TEXAS:
“COHNTY OF LYNN.—This agreement this day entered into between R. A. Henderson party of the first part and W. F. Hudman, party of the second part, witnesseth: That said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the following described property, to wit:
“One bay horse about 14% hands high, nine years old unbranded.
“Also one bay…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moss & Raley v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Watts v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1849
3Cited by38 opinions
- Paramount Fire Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1962
- C. C. Slaughter Cattle Co. v. Potter CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Bergstedt v. BenderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
- Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Huffhines v. BourlandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.