Legal Opinion
Consolidated City of Indianapolis v. Cutshaw
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 3, 1983No. 1-1281A355PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
The defendant-appellant City of Indianapolis (City) appeals from the granting of summary judgment in a cause for declaratory judgment brought by the plaintiffs-ap-pellees which is comprised of massage parlor owners and operators, an adult theater owner, and adult bookstore owners. The trial court found that the City’s Zoning Ordinance 76-AO-2 was constitutionally deficient in a number of particulars.
We reverse.
On September 13, 1976, the City-County Council of Indianapolis and Marion County, Indiana, passed Special Exceptions Zoning Ordinance 76-AO-2 which created a “Class 1…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Podgorny v. Great Central Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Richards v. Goerg Boat & Motors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Boswell v. LyonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rediehs Express, Inc. v. MapleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Garrett v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Tippecanoe Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Richard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hillenbrand v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.