Legal Opinion

Richard v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1985No. 1-1284A311PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

The several defendant-appellants are appealing from their conviction by a jury of diverse offenses. Betty Richard and Mike Skaggs were found guilty of the Class C misdemeanor of unlawfully possessing a deer (IND. CODE 14-2-38-8). Dale Richard was also found guilty of unlawfully possessing a deer as well as the Class C misdemeanor of hunting without the landowner's consent (IND. CODE 14-2-6-1) and the Class B misdemeanor of hunting and taking a deer out of season (IND. CODE 14-2-8-3). Gary Richard was convicted of hunting without the landowner's consent and the Class D felony…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Pirtle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. United States v. James Ernest ManningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harless v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Conwell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Shelton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Shotwell v. Cliff Hagan's Ribeye Franchise, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API