Legal Opinion

Hillenbrand v. City of Evansville

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1983No. 4-483A119PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Rudy Hillenbrand brought suit against defendant-appellee City of Evansville alleging he was wrongfully discharged from employment. The City filed a motion for summary judgment, which was granted. Hillenbrand appeals contending the motion was improperly granted. *

We affirm.

Because this is an appeal from the granting of the City's motion for summary judgment, we will view the facts established by Hillenbrand as true. Hirschauer v. C & E Shoe Jobbers, Inc., (1982) Ind.App., 436 N.E.2d 107. In February 1980, Hillenb-rand was hired by the City as the Chief…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Campbell v. Eli Lilly & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Hirschauer v. C & E Shoe Jobbers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Boland v. GreerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Consolidated City of Indianapolis v. CutshawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Electrical System Division of Bristol Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. McClanahan v. Remington Freight Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Watkins v. Sommer Metalcraft Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
  4. Meyers v. MeyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. McClanahan v. Remington Freight Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API