Hillenbrand v. City of Evansville
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Rudy Hillenbrand brought suit against defendant-appellee City of Evansville alleging he was wrongfully discharged from employment. The City filed a motion for summary judgment, which was granted. Hillenbrand appeals contending the motion was improperly granted. *
We affirm.
Because this is an appeal from the granting of the City's motion for summary judgment, we will view the facts established by Hillenbrand as true. Hirschauer v. C & E Shoe Jobbers, Inc., (1982) Ind.App., 436 N.E.2d 107. In February 1980, Hillenb-rand was hired by the City as the Chief…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Campbell v. Eli Lilly & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hirschauer v. C & E Shoe Jobbers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Boland v. GreerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Consolidated City of Indianapolis v. CutshawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. Electrical System Division of Bristol Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- McClanahan v. Remington Freight Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Watkins v. Sommer Metalcraft Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
- Meyers v. MeyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- McClanahan v. Remington Freight Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.