Legal Opinion

Garrett v. City of Bloomington

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1985No. 1-784A173PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEAL, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Two cases were consolidated for the purpose of this appeal: one, Garrett v. City of Bloomington, et al., involves the grant of defendant's motion for summary judgment in an action for false arrest and imprisonment; the other, City of Bloomington, et al. v. Garrett, concerns the City's petition for the recovery of attorney fees expended in defending the false arrest claim.

We affirm the judgment in both cases.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

On June 18th, 1981, a call was received on the 911 emergency telephone line by the Bloomington Police Department. The Dispatcher…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of NarcoticsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. Thomas Crowder v. Russell E. LashCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. David K. Guenther v. Mark Holmgreen and City of Black River FallsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Works v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Betty A. Linton, Also Known as Betty A. Lasiter, Debtor. Appeal of Betty A. Lasiter and Richard L. ScharpfCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Johnson County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. BurnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. McConnell v. McKillipDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2008
  4. Conwell v. BeattyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Lee v. SchroederIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API