Legal Opinion
Roehling v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 2002No. 49A05-0202-CR-82PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARNES, Judge.
Case Summary
Bruce Roehling appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence recovered during a search of his vehicle. We reverse.
Issue
The sole restated issue before us is whether the State adequately established an exception to the warrant requirement to justify the search of Roehling’s vehicle.
Facts
On June 15, 2001, Roehling went to a residence to look into a problem with the floor. Shortly after he arrived, police officers came to the residence and placed Roehling and two others at the residence in handcuffs in order to execute a search warrant for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Esquerdo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Meno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- Ratliff v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cheatham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Mast v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Black v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003