Legal Opinion

Black v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2003No. 49A02-0207-CR-548Published

1Opinion of the Court

795 N.E.2d 1061 (2003)

Charles BLACK, Appellant-Defendant,

v.

STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff.

No. 49A02-0207-CR-548.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

September 16, 2003.

John L. Tompkins, Brown, Tompkins & Lory, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Christopher L. Lafuse, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

Charles Black appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm.

Issue

The sole issue is whether the trial court erred in denying Black's motion to suppress cocaine…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API