Legal Opinion
McClaren v. United Shoe Machinery Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 19, 1909No. 736PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
1Opinion of the Court
PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was the plaintiff below, so we will call the parties here merely plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiff was injured while running a stitching machine used in the manufacture of shoes, which machine had been leased by the defendant to Weber Bros. Shoe Co. (being the defendant in No. 775, in which an opinion was passed down simultaneously herewith) 166 Fed. 714. Judgment was entered for the defendant in the Circuit Court, and thereupon the plaintiff sued out this writ of error.
The declaration as it came before us contained three counts. A contract…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Bishop v. WeberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Hayes v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- McClaren v. Weber Bros. Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reed & Barton Corporation v. MaasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
- Hudson v. MoonierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- McClaren v. Weber Bros. Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909