Legal Opinion
Reed & Barton Corporation v. Maas
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 10, 1934No. 2914PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Circuit Judge.
This is an action of tort for injuries alleged to have been caused by the appellant’s negligence. The appellee is a minor and brought this action in the name of her father as next friend. The minor will hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff and the appellant as the defendant.
The plaintiff is a resident of Wisconsin, and the defendant is located in Massachusetts. The ad damnum was $25,000.
The defendant is a manufacturer of coffee urns and in 1924 sold the urn involved in this ease to one Horace E. Keebler of Milwaukee, Wis., engaged in the catering business, who, in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. RequenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. J. W. McDavidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Day v. Barber-Colman Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
- Davis v. Grant Park Nursing Home LPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- International Derrick & Equipment Co. v. CroixCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Emmett W. Pryor and Pacific Employers Insurance Company v. Lee C. Moore, CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.