Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Moonier
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 3, 1938No. 10898PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
Pius Moonier brought this action at law against Floyd Hudson and Curtis M. Fitch to recover damages for personal injuries. The case was tried to a jury. At the close of the evidence, each defendant'- made a motion for a directed verdict. These motions were denied. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and from the judgment entered thereon the defendants have appealed. They challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and the correctness of certain of the instructions of the court.
The evidence, taking that view of it most favorable to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Johnson v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Susan Passwaters, by Donald Passwaters, Her Father and Next Friend, and Donald Passwaters v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Egan Chevrolet Co. v. BrunerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.