McClaren v. Weber Bros. Shoe Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
1Opinion of the Court
PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.
In this- case the plaintiff in the court of first instance is also the plaintiff in error. Therefore we will speak of the two parties as the plaintiff and the defendant. This suit arose out of the same injury by the same machine involved in the writ of error in McClaren v. United Shoe Machinery Company (No. 736) 166 Fed. 712, where an opinion was passed down simultaneously with this; and some matters herein are explained there. The essential difference is that Weber Bros. Shoe Company was the employer of the plaintiff, *716using the machine leased by it from the United Shoe…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Butler v. FrazeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Swaim v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Reed & Barton Corporation v. MaasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
- The PegeenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
- Ensign-Bickford Co. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- McClaren v. United Shoe Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.