Legal Opinion
Hines v. Davis
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 22, 1999No. AC 18037PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*837 Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The plaintiff, Sam Hines, appeals from a judgment, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) excluded expert testimony and (2) instructed the jury on General Statutes § 14-218a.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*838The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On August 23, 1994, at 11:15 a.m., the defendant was traveling southbound in his car on Route 87 in Bozrah, approaching the intersection with Stockhouse Road. That part of Route 87 is straight and relatively new, and the weather…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Winn v. PosadesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Paternostro v. Arborio Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. McCarthyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Winn v. PosadesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Rawls v. Progressive Northern InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.