Legal Opinion
Rawls v. Progressive Northern Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 2, 2011No. AC 32119PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The defendant, Progressive Northern Insurance Company, appeals from the trial court’s *504denial of its motions for a directed verdict and to set aside the verdict. The court rendered judgment, after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Ronald Rawls. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly denied its motions (1) for a directed verdict because the plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case and (2) to set aside the verdict and render judgment in accordance with the motion for a directed verdict when there was no evidence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Palmieri v. MacEroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Terminal Taxi Co. v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Toomey v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Chasse v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Winn v. PosadesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dongguk University v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Rawls v. Progressive Northern Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014