Legal Opinion

Ronald Jordan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1965No. 7980PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

The appellant, Ronald Jordan, was convicted by a jury upon a three count indictment for the violation of the narcotic laws (i. e. 26 U.S.C. §§ 4704(a), 4705(a) and 21 U.S.C. § 174) and sentenced to fifteen years on each count to run concurrently. On appeal he complains of (1) refusal of the Court to specially instruct the jury on the credibility of the informer; (2) undue curtailment of cross-examination to impeach the informer’s testimony; (8) failure to properly define “narcotic drug”; (4) insufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction on count II, i. e. sale of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Maurice E. Travis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  3. Joseph E. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. Bobby Dean Todd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Lloyd Carl Cummings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. People v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  3. Pete Griego Garcia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Joseph MauroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Harold E. MillsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API