Legal Opinion

Maurice E. Travis v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 21, 1959No. 5879PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This action is here on appeal for the second time. On the first appeal,1 this court set aside a conviction under the false statement statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1001,2 and ordered a new trial because of prejudicial error committed when the prosecutor was allowed to improperly cross-examine appellant’s character witnesses. The present appeal is from a second conviction after retrial of the case in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Reversal is sought upon a claim of insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and numerous assertions of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Killian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Travis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Leo C. Gonzales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  4. Beatrice Foods Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  5. Martis C. Scalf v. John E. Bennett, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary, Fort Madison, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API