Legal Opinion
Randall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 24, 1983No. CX-82-995PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
Appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) and its agent Lynn Bauman appeal from a judgment finding respondent Wesley Randall entitled to personal injury protection benefits for injuries he sustained as a result of a motorcycle accident. Respondent claims that State Farm is liable for the payment of personal injury protection benefits because it failed to make the statutorily-mandated offer of such coverage in connection with his renewal or reinstatement of motorcycle insurance in the year of the accident. Because we conclude the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Kuchenmeister v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Gudvangen v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Makela v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Squier v. Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Tibbals v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.