Legal Opinion

Squier v. Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1984No. C6-84-786PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

356 N.W.2d 832 (1984)

Gary Lee SQUIER, et al., Appellants,

v.

MILWAUKEE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. C6-84-786.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 30, 1984.

Review Denied February 6, 1985.

Douglas P. Kempf, James D. Kempf, Douglas P. Kempf, Bloomington, for appellants.

Willard L. Converse, David Anderson, Peterson, Bell & Converse, St. Paul, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and FORSBERG and LESLIE, JJ.

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the respondent Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company. The trial court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Kuchenmeister v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  5. League General Insurance Co. v. TvedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dewart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Lewis v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Pinney v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API