Legal Opinion

Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1951No. 35,496PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

Plaintiff, Employers Mutual Casualty Company, issued to one Clement F. Lange a liability insurance policy on Lange’s automobile, whereby it agreed to indemnify Lange for any loss or liability by reason of injury or loss sustained by any person as a result of the operation of said automobile.

Defendant railway company has a spur track which crosses trunk highway No. 99 a short distance east of the Minnesota River bridge at the city of St. Peter.

In the evening of July 15, 1917, Lange was driving his automobile in an easterly direction on highway No. 99 and across said track of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Ellis v. EssonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Ankeny v. MoffettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Gronquist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. White v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API