Legal Opinion
Rubright v. Arnold
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1999No. S-7010PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Adeline Arnold sued Stephen Rubright, claiming that Stephen is the biological father of her son Christopher. She sought a judgment for past and future child support. The superior court entered a final judgment which found Stephen to be the father of Christopher. He was adjudged liable for child support arrearages of $94,578, including prejudgment interest, and attorney’s fees of $11,578.80. Stephen was ordered to pay future child support of $658.18 per month.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Christopher was born in 1987. At that time Adeline was married to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Vachon v. PuglieseAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Veazey v. VeazeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Bergstrom v. LindbackAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Wingate v. Estate of RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Ex Parte Martin by and Through SarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Koller v. ReftAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Skinner v. HagbergAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- J.P.M. v. T.D.M.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Sanders v. BarthAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.