Bartholomew v. Langsdale
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.
The appellant sued the appellee for one thousand dollars, for professional work, labor, and services, as follows: making six motions for new trials, making and filing bills of exceptions in Myer v. Hereth, ordering transcripts and getting cases ready for Supreme Court, obtaining supersedeas in same, making thirteen abstracts for Supreme Court, making three assignments of errors; all which labor and services were rendered in the following cases, namely: Mary F. Love v. John C. Plereth et al., Mary Smith v. Pl.ereth et al., George B. Yandes v. Hereth et al., F. A. W. Davis v. Hereth et al.,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Snodgrass v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Horton v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Dawson v. CoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Elliott v. WoodwardIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Robinson v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Hillegass v. BenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Pinto v. SeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Douglass v. BlankenshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Prescott v. HaugheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.