Legal Opinion
Ruebsamen v. Maddocks
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 11, 1975PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELAHANTY, Justice.
Plaintiffs Otto and Emly Ruebsamen, father and daughter, brought an action under 14 M.R.S.A. § 6051(4) against defendant Dale Maddocks, former husband to Emly, for abuse and breach of confidential relations. After trial, the Superior Court (Hancock County) decreed that defendant convey to plaintiffs whatever interest he had in certain real estate owned jointly by the three. Defendant appeals the decision below, and we deny the appeal.
From the facts found by the Superior Court it would appear that sometime before April, 1968 defendant and plaintiff Emly Ruebsamen met, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Hinds v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
- Horner v. FlynnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Eldridge v. MaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
- Gerrish v. ChambersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Paul Reid and Mary J. Reid v. Key Bank of Southern Maine, Inc., Paul Reid and Mary J. Reid v. Key Bank of Southern Maine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Diversified Foods, Inc. v. First National Bank of BostonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Zamore v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Bryan R. v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- United States v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.