Legal Opinion

Horner v. Flynn

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 6, 1975PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

Of the many interesting issues raised by this defendant’s appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, one issue stands out as requiring extensive analysis and discussion.

The complaint alleged fraud.

The defendant requested the presiding Justice to instruct the jurors they could return a verdict for the plaintiff only if the evidence of fraud was "clear and convincing”

This the presiding Justice refused to do.

Instead he instructed the jury it was the responsibility of the plaintiff to persuade the jurors “by a fair preponderance of the evidence”…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. State v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  5. Simon v. Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental RetardationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. Slomowitz v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Townsend v. Maine Bureau of Public SafetySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API