Legal Opinion

Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Davis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 21, 1983No. 82-202PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

In 1970 we held that a federal savings and loan association must demonstrate that its security is impaired before it will be permitted to accelerate the maturity date of a loan and declare the entire debt due if the property securing the loan is sold or otherwise transferred. Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 252 Ark. 849, 481 S.W.2d 725 (1972). Four years later the Federal Home Loan Bank Board issued a regulation which, in part, provides:

[A federal savings and loan] association continues to have the power to include, as a matter of contract between it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Elcare, Inc. v. GocioSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Abrego v. United Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Brown v. MinorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Pledger v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Schulte v. Benton Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Hoffman v. GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API