Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Davis
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
In 1970 we held that a federal savings and loan association must demonstrate that its security is impaired before it will be permitted to accelerate the maturity date of a loan and declare the entire debt due if the property securing the loan is sold or otherwise transferred. Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 252 Ark. 849, 481 S.W.2d 725 (1972). Four years later the Federal Home Loan Bank Board issued a regulation which, in part, provides:
[A federal savings and loan] association continues to have the power to include, as a matter of contract between it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Elcare, Inc. v. GocioSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
3Cited by12 opinions
- Abrego v. United Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Brown v. MinorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Pledger v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Schulte v. Benton Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Hoffman v. GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.