Legal Opinion
Cover v. Schwartz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 6, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
This is a motion for reargument. Heretofore the defendant moved for an order staying the plaintiff from proceeding to trial. The motion was granted and the plaintiff was stayed from proceeding to trial until the disposition of an interference proceeding, now pending before the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
The plaintiff claims that this court has been led into error in basing its former decision on the case of Jensen v. Lorenz, 68 App.D.C. 39, 92 F.2d 992. In reading that case, as well as all the additional authorities cited, I feel that there is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Jensen v. LorenzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Wettlaufer v. RobinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- MacGregor v. ChesterfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1929
- Pennzoil Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Research Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960
- Aeration Processes, Inc. v. Walter Kidde & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Childers Foods, Inc. v. Rockingham Poultry Marketing Co-op, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1962
- Amersham International PLC. v. Corning Glass WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.