Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pennzoil Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 28, 1938No. 4039PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BlaNd, Judge,

delivered tlie opinion of the court:

The appellee, Hercules Powder Company, has here moved to dismiss the instant ajipeal of the Pennzoil Company.

The motion is based upon the following facts: The Hercules Powder Company sought to register in the United States Patent Office the term “DIPENSOL” for a terpene hydrocarbon solvent for use in processes and compounds using turpentine. The Pennzoil Company filed notice of opposition, based upon its ownership and use of. its registered trade-mark “PENNZOIL” for lubricating oils and other' hydrocarbon products. The Examiner of Interferences…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pacific Steamship Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. United States Ex Rel. Baldwin Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Baldwin Co. v. R. S. Howard Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. E. C. Atkins & Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tomlinson of High Point v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Eno v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939
  3. Cover v. SchwartzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  4. Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1941
  5. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Universal Motor Oils Co., IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API