Legal Opinion
Jensen v. Lorenz
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 30, 1937No. Nos. 6881, 6882PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
It appears that Jensen and Bye, the appellants, were involved in an interference in the Patent Office with the appellees Lorenz and Wodlinger involving competing claims to a certain' patent for the use of Vitamin D as an element in soap. The interference was terminated against Jensen and Bye, who thereupon appealed to the Board of Appeals. The Board affirmed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences. Thereupon Jensen and Bye brought a bill in equity in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia under section 4915, Rev.St., as amended (35 U.S.C.A. §…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bakelite Corporation v. National Aniline & Chem. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Walther v. VanderveerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- United States Ex Rel. White v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Chase v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Biogen Ma, Inc. v. Japanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.