Legal Opinion
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 9, 1953No. 10639, 10761PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company in the consolidated petitions for review now before us asks this court to set aside the same two orders of the Federal Power Commission which were involved in the two consolidated petitions for review filed by Michigan Consolidated Gas Company which we have just decided. Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v. Federal Power Comm., 3 Cir., 203 F.2d 895. The basic facts with respect to the orders in controversy are set out at length in our opinion in those cases and need not be repeated here.
The petition filed by Panhandle to No. 10,639 seeks review…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ederal Power Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
3Cited by15 opinions
- Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, a Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- The Central West Utility Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Michigan Consolidated Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.