Legal Opinion
Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 29, 1960No. Nos. 14975-14977, 15061, 15065, 15070, 15073, 15074, 15077, 15093, 15144PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
This proceeding is another encounter in a long running battle between Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (“Panhandle”) and American Natural Gas Company (“American Natural”) the dominant corporations in two of the largest natural gas systems serving the Midwest.1 Their difficulties arose shortly after Panhandle and American Natural’s subsidiary, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (“Michigan Consolidated”) entered into a contract in 1935 which, as amended, required Panhandle, an interstate natural gas transportation company, to furnish Michigan Consolidated, a local gas…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Braniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Placid Oil Company, Sola II v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Don Sabin v. Earl H. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and Edward P. Cliff, Chief, U. S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Barnett v. Anaconda CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.