Legal Opinion
Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 30, 1953No. 10589, 10783PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company in these consolidated petitions for review asks this court to set aside two orders issued by the Federal Power Commission in consolidated proceedings involving Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company in which proceedings Michigan- Consolidated was permitted by the Commission to intervene. The orders under attack prescribed Panhandle’s obligation to deliver natural gas to Michigan Consolidated at Detroit and limited its obligation to 125,000 Mcf per day, the amount then currently being delivered, although Michigan Consolidated had claimed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Interstate Com. Commiss. v. B. & O. RAILROADSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. Chicago Heights Trucking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States ex rel. Northwestern Warehouse Co. v. Oregon R. & Navigation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1908
3Cited by14 opinions
- Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, a Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.